• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Get Connected
  • My Account
  • 0Shopping Cart
National Home Education Research Institute
  • Home
  • Research
    • Research
    • Home School Researcher Journal
    • Bibliography & References
    • Homeschooling Research News
    • Get Connected
  • News
  • Store
  • Donate
  • Calendar
  • About
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Get Connected
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Blog - Latest News
You are here: Home1 / Home School Researcher2 / Volume 29, Issue 23 / A Brief Review of Religion, volunteering, and educational setting: The...

A Brief Review of Religion, volunteering, and educational setting: The effect of youth schooling type on civic engagement, by Hill and Den Dulk

April 10, 2013/in Volume 29, Issue 2/by Brian D. Ray, Ph.D.

PERSPECTIVES – News and Comments1

A Brief Review of Religion, volunteering, and educational setting: The effect of youth schooling type on civic engagement, by Hill and Den Dulk

 Brian D. Ray

National Home Education Research Institute, Salem, Oregon, USA

Keywords: homeschooling, education, home-school, youth, civic engagement, volunteer, religion, education

What are home-educated children like when they get older? How about at 13 to 17 years of age, or when 18 to 23 years old? That is a very broad question. Narrowing it down, professors Hill and den Dulk wondered, Do young people continue to be engaged in volunteering at different rates depending on their educational setting background (Hill & Den Dulk, 2013)? They examined this topic, persisting in volunteering, as one way to hypothesize about civic engagement.

Using data from a national sample of youth, the researchers compared the rate at which those from different educational backgrounds continued to be involved in volunteering at ages 18 to 23 if they had been volunteers at ages 13 to 17. The survey question for determining “volunteering” was the following: “In the last year, how much, if at all, have you done organized volunteer work or community service?” (p. 185-186). Only youth who responded they had done any when younger were included in this study. Thus, Hill and den Dulk were examining the rate of continuing, at 18 to 23, to do volunteer or community service. The sample size of homeschooled youth was 60, out of a total sample of about 2,598.

The researchers carefully statistically controlled for many background variables such as religious beliefs, religious tradition/denomination, parental and youth worship attendance, parental encouragement of youth volunteering, parental volunteering, employment status of youth, “care” about racial equality, whether volunteering was required of the respondent, and standard demographic variables such as parents’ education and income, gender, age, and race/ethnicity. They also utilized various theoretical and statistical models for exploring and understanding the data.

Simply put, they found that students who attended “Protestant” schools and “Catholic” schools during high school were more likely than public school students to continue in volunteering while those who attended “homeschool” and “private, non-religious” schools were less likely than public school students to continue volunteering. According to one of the researchers’ models, “… 83 percent of Protestant schooled emerging adults who volunteered in adolescence continue to volunteer …” while the percents are 55% for Catholic school students, 48% for public school students, 23% for homeschoolers, and 10% for private nonreligious school students.

What is the significance of these findings? What are some things they tell us, and what do they not tell us?

First, one should look at the main variable or “outcome” of consideration: Do the “emerging adults” continue to volunteer? Volunteer is operationally defined as “… how much, if at all, have you done organized volunteer work or community service?” One must ask, What does this mean to a respondent, a study participant? Also, one should ask, From my worldview (e.g., postmodernism, critical theory, scripturalism), is it important for a young person to answer “yes” to this question? Further, would a homeschool (or any) respondent consider helping a poor widow next door or babysitting at no cost for a couple so that they can go out to dinner together as “community service”?

Next, the study does not tell us what percent of Protestant schoolers, Catholic schoolers, the others, or homeschoolers were involved in volunteering as 13- to 17-year-olds or 18- to 23-year-olds. The study only examines at what rate they continue in volunteering. That is, perhaps Catholic schoolers at 18 to 23 volunteer at a higher rate than Protestant schoolers but persisted, from about age 15 to about age 21 at a lower rate.

Third, one must be especially cautious about a very small sample size of 60, for homeschoolers (at age 18-23), when drawing conclusions about a national population that was probably hundreds of thousands of young adults at the time (2007-2008). If the sample of 60 was certainly representative of all those who were homeschooled in high school and if the samples of the other types of schooling were also representative, then (and only then) one can be fairly certain that the statistical differences the researchers found represented reality. The small sample size for homeschoolers is one reason the authors provided confidence intervals in Figure 1 (Personal communication with one author, March 21, 2013). For example, if the sampling was truly representative, the researchers are 95% confident that homeschoolers continue in volunteering at the rate of somewhere between about 9% to 38%, and Catholic schoolers between about 39% to 69%; that is, the difference might be practically insignificant.

Finally, the person interested in the extent to which young adults from various educational backgrounds participate in volunteer work, continue in volunteer work, or are civically engaged should consider other research that touches upon these topics. Researchers Hill and den Dulk did not mention some of these. For example, researcher Montgomery (1989) concluded that the home educated are very involved in activities that predict leadership and home education “… may in fact, nurture leadership at least as well as does the conventional [school] system” (p. 8).

Ray (2004), in a nationwide study of 5,254 adults who were homeschooled, found that for all civic activities (e.g., working for candidate/political party/political cause, voting in national/state elections) and at all age groups, the home-educated adults were more civically involved than the overall national population” (p. 49) and were participating in any ongoing community service activity at a rate higher than the national average. Further, Sutton and Galloway (2000) reported that “… results from multivariate analysis of variance showed college graduates from home schools held significantly more leadership posts for significantly greater periods of time than did the private school group” while there was no significant difference on these variables between the homeschooled and public-schooled (p. 137).

The Hill and den Dulk is one study in what is a growing mosaic of research pieces that address many aspects of homeschooling and its effects on lives and society. Several more pieces of research will need to be done to have a relatively firm grip on whether adults who were home educated engage in volunteer work or civic activities at the same rate or a different rate than those who attended institutional schools.

References

Hill, Jonathan P.; Den Dulk, Kevin R. (2013). Religion, volunteering, and educational setting: The effect of youth schooling type on civic engagement. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52(1):179–197.

Montgomery, Linda R. (1989). The effect of home schooling on the leadership skills of home schooled students. Home School Researcher, 5(1), 1-10, www.nheri.org.

Ray, Brian D. (2004). Home educated and now adults: Their community and civic involvement, views about homeschooling, and other traits. Salem, OR: National Home Education Research Institute, www.nheri.org. The adults in this study were not necessarily representative of all who had been homeschooled.

Sutton, Joe P., & Galloway, Rhonda. (2000). College success of students from three high school settings. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 33(3), 137-146.

Endnote

  1. The “Perspectives – News and Comments” section of this journal consists of articles that have not undergone peer review.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Tags: civic engagement, education, home-educated, Homeschooling, religion, youth
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.nheri.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/logo-new-nheri.png 0 0 Brian D. Ray, Ph.D. https://www.nheri.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/logo-new-nheri.png Brian D. Ray, Ph.D.2013-04-10 20:26:302019-08-15 18:23:43A Brief Review of Religion, volunteering, and educational setting: The effect of youth schooling type on civic engagement, by Hill and Den Dulk
You might also like
Examination of Previously Homeschooled College Students with the Big Five Model of Personality
Homeschooled Students’ Adjustment to College
MUSIC IN HOME EDUCATION: A CREATIVE APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING MUSIC
Justice, Inequality, and Home Schooling
SCIENCE INSTRUCTION OF HOME SCHOOLED TEENAGERS
HOME SCHOOLING: AN EFFECTIVE ENVIRONMENT FOR PROGRAMMED INSTRUCTION
Attachment Theory and Home-Based Education
Academic Intrinsic Motivation in Homeschooled Children

Pages

  • 30th Anniversary
  • About NHERI
  • Academic Leadership Journal
  • African American Homeschool Parents’ Motivations for Homeschooling and Their Black Children’s Academic Achievement
  • Calendar of Events
  • Cart
  • Checkout
  • Child Abuse and Neglect Fatalities Not Correlated with Homeschooling
  • Child Abuse of Public School, Private School, and Homeschool Students: Evidence, Philosophy, and Reason
  • Contact NHERI
  • Gen2 Survey: A Spiritual and Educational Survey on Christian Millennials
  • Home Page
  • Home School Researcher Journal
  • Homeschool SAT Scores for 2014 Higher Than National Average
  • Homeschooling and Child Abuse, Child Neglect, and Child Fatalities
  • Homeschooling Research, Studies, and Scholarship
  • My Account
  • News
  • Shop
  • Donate to NHERI
  • Home School Researcher Archives
  • Perceived Effectiveness of Home Education Event Marketing Tools
  • Special Education Teachers’ Perceptions and Beliefs Regarding Homeschooling Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders
  • Strengthening the Ties that Bind
  • Get Connected
  • Home School Researcher (journal) Manuscript Submission Guidelines for Authors
  • Home School Researcher Editorial Board
  • __404__
  • Home Centered Learning Annotated Bibliography
  • Peabody Journal of Education Special Issue on Homeschooling 2013
  • A Book Review of Homeschooling in America by Joseph Murphy
  • Academic Achievement and Demographic Traits of Homeschool Students: A Nationwide Study
  • Homeschooling Research Studies, References, Academic Scholarship, and Bibliographies
  • Bibliography of Research on Homeschooling – International
  • Help Needed from Anyone on New Study Underway
  • Careful Study Finds Homeschool Advantage
  • Research Facts on Homeschooling
  • Homeschool Population Report 2010
  • Home-Educated Doing Well at College: Research by Michael Cogan
  • The Harms of Homeschooling? Where Are the Premises?
  • Homeschooling Across America: Academic Achievement and Demographic Characteristics
  • Homeschooling: More Ethnic Minorities, Lower-Income Families, and Parents Moderately High Education
  • Is There Any Solid Evidence For Expanding Compulsory School Age

Categories

  • Home School Researcher
  • NHERI News
  • Research
  • Volume 01, Issue 1
  • Volume 01, Issue 2
  • Volume 01, Issue 3
  • Volume 01, Issue 4
  • Volume 02, Issue 1
  • Volume 02, Issue 2
  • Volume 02, Issue 3
  • Volume 02, Issue 4
  • Volume 03, Issue 1
  • Volume 03, Issue 2
  • Volume 03, Issue 3
  • Volume 03, Issue 4
  • Volume 04, Issue 1
  • Volume 04, Issue 2
  • Volume 04, Issue 3
  • Volume 04, Issue 4
  • Volume 05, Issue 1
  • Volume 05, Issue 2
  • Volume 05, Issue 3
  • Volume 05, Issue 4
  • Volume 06, Issue 1
  • Volume 06, Issue 2
  • Volume 06, Issue 3
  • Volume 06, Issue 4
  • Volume 07, Issue 1
  • Volume 07, Issue 2
  • Volume 07, Issue 3
  • Volume 07, Issue 4
  • Volume 08, Issue 1
  • Volume 08, Issue 2
  • Volume 08, Issue 3
  • Volume 08, Issue 4
  • Volume 09, Issue 1
  • Volume 09, Issue 2
  • Volume 09, Issue 3
  • Volume 09, Issue 4
  • Volume 10, Issue 1
  • Volume 10, Issue 2
  • Volume 10, Issue 3
  • Volume 10, Issue 4
  • Volume 11, Issue 1
  • Volume 11, Issue 2
  • Volume 11, Issue 3
  • Volume 11, Issue 4
  • Volume 12, Issue 1
  • Volume 12, Issue 2
  • Volume 12, Issue 3
  • Volume 13, Issue 1
  • Volume 13, Issue 2
  • Volume 13, Issue 3
  • Volume 13, Issue 4
  • Volume 14, Issue 1
  • Volume 14, Issue 2
  • Volume 14, Issue 3
  • Volume 14, Issue 4
  • Volume 15, Issue 1
  • Volume 15, Issue 2
  • Volume 15, Issue 3
  • Volume 15, Issue 4
  • Volume 16, Issue 1
  • Volume 16, Issue 2
  • Volume 16, Issue 3
  • Volume 16, Issue 4
  • Volume 17, Issue 1
  • Volume 17, Issue 2
  • Volume 17, Issue 3
  • Volume 17, Issue 4
  • Volume 25, Issue 1
  • Volume 25, Issue 2
  • Volume 25, Issue 3
  • Volume 25, Issue 4
  • Volume 26, Issue 1
  • Volume 26, Issue 2
  • Volume 26, Issue 3
  • Volume 27, Issue 1
  • Volume 28, Issue 1
  • Volume 29, Issue 1
  • Volume 29, Issue 2
  • Volume 29, Issue 3
  • Volume 29, Issue 4
  • Volume 30, Issue 1
  • Volume 30, Issue 2
  • Volume 30, Issue 3
  • Volume 30, Issue 4
  • Volume 31, Issue 1
  • Volume 31, Issue 2
  • Volume 31, Issue 3
  • Volume 31, Issue 4
  • Volume 32, Issue 1
  • Volume 32, Issue 2
  • Volume 32, Issue 3
  • Volume 32, Issue 4
  • Volume 33, Issue 1
  • Volume 33, Issue 2
  • Volume 33, Issue 3
  • Volume 33, Issue 4
  • Volume 34, Issue 1
  • Volume 34, Issue 2
  • Volume 34, Issue 3
  • Volume 34, Issue 4
  • Volume 35, Issue 1
  • Volume 35, Issue 2
  • Volume 35, Issue 3
  • Volume 35, Issue 4
  • Volume 36, Issue 1
  • Volume 36, Issue 3
  • Volume 36, Issue 4
  • Volume 37, Issue 1
  • Volume 37, Issue 2
  • Volume 37, Issue 3
  • Volume 37, Issue 4
  • Volume 38, Issue 1

Archive

  • December 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • May 2021
  • March 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • December 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • September 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • October 2017
  • July 2017
  • April 2017
  • January 2017
  • October 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • July 2015
  • April 2015
  • January 2015
  • October 2014
  • July 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • October 2013
  • July 2013
  • April 2013
  • January 2013
  • April 2012
  • January 2012
  • July 2011
  • April 2011
  • January 2011
  • October 2010
  • July 2010
  • April 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • March 2008
  • October 2007
  • August 2007
  • April 2007
  • October 2006
  • July 2006
  • April 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • July 2005
  • April 2005
  • January 2004
  • October 2003
  • July 2003
  • April 2002
  • January 2002
  • October 2001
  • July 2000
  • April 2000
  • January 2000
  • October 1999
  • July 1999
  • January 1999
  • January 1998
  • July 1996
  • April 1996
  • January 1996
  • October 1995
  • July 1995
  • April 1995
  • January 1995
  • October 1994
  • July 1994
  • April 1994
  • January 1994
  • October 1993
  • July 1993
  • April 1993
  • January 1993
  • October 1992
  • July 1992
  • April 1992
  • January 1992
  • October 1991
  • July 1991
  • April 1991
  • January 1991
  • October 1990
  • July 1990
  • April 1990
  • January 1990
  • October 1989
  • July 1989
  • April 1989
  • January 1989
  • October 1988
  • July 1988
  • April 1988
  • January 1988
  • October 1987
  • July 1987
  • April 1987
  • January 1987
  • October 1986
  • July 1986
  • April 1986
  • January 1986
  • October 1985
  • July 1985
  • April 1985
  • January 1985

About NHERI

NHERI conducts homeschooling research, is a clearinghouse of research for the public, researchers, homeschoolers, the media, and policy makers, and educates the public concerning the findings of all related research. NHERI executes, evaluates, and disseminates studies and information (e.g., statistics, facts, data) on homeschooling (i.e., home schooling, home-based education, home education, home school, home-schooling, unschooling, deschooling, a form of alternative education), publishes reports and the peer-reviewed scholarly journal Home School Researcher, and serves in consulting, academic achievement tests, and expert witness (in courts and legislatures).

PO Box 13939
Salem, OR 97309
503-364-1490
503-364-3837 fax
contact NHERI

Research

  • Academic Leadership Journal
  • Bibliography of Research on Homeschooling
  • Education Resources Information Center
  • Home School Researcher journal
  • NHERI on Research
  • NHERI Research News
  • Journal of School Choice review of research

About Homeschooling

  • Classical Conversations
  • Home School Legal Defense Association
  • Homeschool Freedom in your state
  • Homeschool World
  • Homeschooling Today
  • State Homeschool Organizations
  • The Old Schoolhouse
  • The Teaching Home
© Copyright - National Home Education Research Institute -- Site Design by EMWD
A Heuristic Inquiry into the Stress that Home Educators ExperienceEconomic Impact of Home and Private Schooling on the Public Education System:...
Scroll to top